Mead Johnson Nutrition Co MJN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1452575Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2008 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Mayer Brown | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Davis Polk | Dec 2008 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan L. DavisKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- David A. SchuetteMayer BrownFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ronald CamiCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Susan WebsterCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan L. DavisKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| David A. SchuetteMayer Brown | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ronald CamiCravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Susan WebsterCravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 |