Tanke Biosciences Corp TNBI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1452011Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Leonard E. NeilsonFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2011 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Leonard E. Neilson | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 30 | 1.20 | 1.32 | 0.74 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Thomas SlusarczykANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
- Evan L. GreebelKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Howard S. JacobsKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Yue CaoEaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.40× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Leonard NeilsonFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Leonard E. NeilsonLeonard E. NeilsonFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 153 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 0.95 |
| Thomas SlusarczykANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.05 |
| Evan L. GreebelKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.68 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
| Howard S. JacobsKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 1.59 |
| Yue CaoEaton & Van Winkle LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.40 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2011 | Text search only | 187 | 0.98 | 1.25 | 1.32 |
| Leonard Neilson | May 2011 | Text search only | 8 | 0.99 | 1.14 | 0.82 |
| Leonard E. NeilsonLeonard E. Neilson | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 32 | 1.09 | 1.65 | 0.71 |