Essent Group Ltd. ESNT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1448893Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- White and WilliamsFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willkie Farr | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 126 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 110 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 1.03 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| White and Williams | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 20 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael A. KatzWillkie FarrFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alexander M. DyeWillkie FarrFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael GrollWillkie FarrFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Jeffrey C. HowlandWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.55× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael A. KatzWillkie Farr | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alexander M. DyeWillkie Farr | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael GrollWillkie Farr | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Jeffrey C. HowlandWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 3.55 | 0.00 |