Redwood Mortgage Investors IX
CIK 1448038Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hanson Bridgett LLPFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Dec 2008 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanson Bridgett LLP | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Alston & Bird | Dec 2008 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Teresa V. PahlHanson Bridgett LLPFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Karen A. DempseyOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Lynne T. HirataOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- Stephen J. SchraderBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teresa V. PahlHanson Bridgett LLP | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Karen A. DempseyOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.41 | 1.24 | 1.00 |
| Lynne T. HirataOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.86 |
| Stephen J. SchraderBaker & McKenzie | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |