China Dredging Group Co., Ltd.
CIK 1447976Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dacheng Law OfficesFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacheng Law Offices | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 50 | 1.71 | 0.69 | 1.09 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Maples and Calder | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew LedbetterDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Jonathan KleinDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
- Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2011 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- Steven LiuDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- William N. HaddadVenable LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew LedbetterDLA Piper | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Jonathan KleinDLA Piper | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.12 |
| Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2011 | Named in a filing | 63 | 1.72 | 0.67 | 1.86 |
| Steven LiuDLA Piper | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.69 | 1.51 | 1.57 |
| William N. HaddadVenable LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 40 | 1.71 | 0.41 | 1.36 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |