Funtalk China Holdings Ltd

CIK 1444677Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

None

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 0; None on record
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 14; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 14; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Mar 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	741	1.31	0.12	0.76
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett	Jul 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	1,396	1.28	0.11	0.92
Maples and Calder	Oct 2009	Named in a filing	1,144	0.95	0.26	0.92
Latham & Watkins LLP	Sep 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Loeb & Loeb LLP	Sep 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	838	0.92	0.99	1.10
Conyers Dill & Pearman	Jun 2011	Text search only	531	0.89	0.35	1.16
Commerce & Finance Law Offices	Jul 2010	Text search only	157	1.00	0.53	1.02
K&L Gates	Mar 2009	Text search only	723	1.06	1.35	1.18
Preston Gates & Ellis	Mar 2009	Text search only	159	1.36	1.62	1.44
Squire Sanders (US)	Mar 2009	Text search only	199	0.88	0.98	1.13
Han Kun	Jan 2009	Text search only	178	1.08	0.35	0.87
Cozen O'Connor P.C.	Sep 2008	Text search only	163	1.03	0.63	0.94
Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP	Sep 2008	Text search only	54	0.75	1.63	1.56

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & Bartlett	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	36	1.16	0.85	1.41
Michael V. GisserSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	22	0.36	0.00	0.00
Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	51	0.26	0.00	0.17
Sang Jin HanCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	6	1.71	0.00	0.00
Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis	Jun 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	40	0.80	0.00	0.67
David C. FischerLoeb & Loeb LLP	Mar 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	13	0.00	0.00	2.09
David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis	Sep 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	118	1.03	0.61	1.22
Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP	Sep 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	391	0.98	0.93	1.21
Ralph V. De MartinoArentFox Schiff LLP	Sep 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	78	0.51	1.20	1.38
David LambConyers Dill & Pearman	Jun 2011	Text search only	7	0.00	0.00	0.79
Allen C. WangLatham & Watkins LLP	Nov 2009	Text search only	18	1.43	0.00	0.41
Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLP	Nov 2009	Text search only	16	0.94	0.00	0.66
John A. OtoshiLatham & Watkins LLP	Nov 2009	Text search only	24	1.77	1.16	1.42
Samuel G. Coppersmith	Mar 2009	Text search only	5	0.00	0.00	0.00