Change Healthcare Holdings, Inc. EM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1444598Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bass, Berry & SimsFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Adams and ReeseFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bass, Berry & Sims | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.88 | 0.61 | 0.70 |
| Ropes & Gray | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Fried Frank | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Adams and Reese | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 37 | 1.78 | 0.43 | 1.55 |
| Alston & Bird | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Craig E. MarcusRopes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Robert B. SchumerPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Matthew W. AbbottPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Brett NadritchMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Jay J. KimRopes & GrayFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- John D. AmorosiDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John G. FinleySimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- DOUGLAS A. CIFUPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Steven L. GrossmanO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig E. MarcusRopes & Gray | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Robert B. SchumerPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Matthew W. AbbottPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Brett NadritchMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| John C. KennedyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 88 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Jay J. KimRopes & Gray | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 11 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| John D. AmorosiDavis Polk | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 17 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John G. FinleySimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 17 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| DOUGLAS A. CIFUPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 26 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Steven L. GrossmanO Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 13 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.84 |