GAIN Capital Holdings, Inc. GCAP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1444363Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Global Law OfficeFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & PerrettiFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.90× · Went dark 2.06× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Davis Polk | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Morgan Lewis | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.38 |
| Global Law Office | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 67 | 1.06 | 0.80 | 1.14 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Mayer Brown | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Proskauer Rose | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Reed Smith | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 10 | 2.90 | 2.06 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Leonard KreyninDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- David C. SchwartzDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Andrew P. GilbertDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Joseph A. HallDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonard KreyninDavis Polk | Oct 2018 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| David C. SchwartzDLA Piper | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Andrew P. GilbertDLA Piper | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.01 |
| Joseph A. HallDavis Polk | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.82 |