AMBICOM HOLDINGS, INC
CIK 1444310Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kane Kessler, P.C.First linked Feb 2015 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Eric P. LittmanFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Thomas E. Puzzo, PLLCFirst linked Sep 2008 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 2.30× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kane Kessler, P.C. | Feb 2015 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.27 | 1.59 | 0.98 |
| Eric P. Littman | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.32 | 2.29 | 0.89 |
| Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.69 | 0.84 | 1.16 |
| Thomas E. Puzzo, PLLC | Sep 2008 | Text search only | 115 | 1.61 | 2.30 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric P. LittmanEric P. LittmanFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 2.45× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Peter CampitielloKane Kessler, P.C.First linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Thomas E. PuzzoThomas E. Puzzo, PLLCFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in a filing · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 2.35× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric P. LittmanEric P. Littman | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.50 | 2.45 | 1.05 |
| Peter CampitielloKane Kessler, P.C. | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 55 | 2.15 | 1.30 | 1.37 |
| Thomas E. PuzzoThomas E. Puzzo, PLLC | Sep 2008 | Named in a filing | 115 | 1.70 | 2.35 | 0.92 |