World Omni LT
CIK 1443836Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & AxelrodFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Jeffrey S. O ConnorFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Mayer Brown | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 19 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Dechert LLP | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Jeffrey S. O Connor | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 8 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paula PescaruGersten Savage LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jeffrey S. O'ConnorKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Stuart M. LitwinMayer BrownFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula PescaruGersten Savage LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 1.28 |
| Jeffrey S. O'ConnorKirkland & Ellis | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Stuart M. LitwinMayer Brown | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |