CYCLONE POWER TECHNOLOGIES INC CYPW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1442711Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Roetzel & AndressFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 2.94× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Wyatt Tarrant & CombsFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roetzel & Andress | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.77 | 2.94 | 2.10 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Wyatt Tarrant & Combs | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 53 | 1.40 | 0.35 | 1.08 |
| Akerman LLP | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Clint J. GageRoetzel & AndressFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 3.11× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.42 |
| Clint J. GageRoetzel & Andress | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 16 | 1.87 | 3.11 | 1.89 |