CNC Development Ltd.
CIK 1442508Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 841 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Beijing Kang Da Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 841 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.13 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Beijing Kang Da Law Firm | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.13 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Douglas J. ReinDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.22 |
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.32 |
| Douglas J. ReinDLA Piper | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 27 | 1.08 | 0.49 | 0.81 |