Pro Farm Group, Inc. MBII (last ticker on record)

CIK 1441693Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
95% wipeout
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began Feb 2016
Largest fall in its shares: 96%; Oct 2013 to Jan 2022
Law firms: 7; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 6; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Jul 13, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 8, 2021Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 24, 2020Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 3, 2018Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 12, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 6, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 24, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 17, 2016An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Feb 17, 2016An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Jan 13, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 7, 2016Shares down 95% from their high
Dec 28, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 12, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 23, 2015Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 21, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 3, 2014Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Linklaters LLP	Jun 2022	Named in a filing	156	1.05	0.00	0.63
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett	Nov 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	1,396	1.28	0.11	0.92
Morrison & Foerster	Sep 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	825	1.17	0.55	1.15
Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Dec 2016	Text search only	963	0.96	1.12	1.21
Dykema Gossett	Jun 2013	Text search only	115	0.95	0.23	0.87
GCA Law Partners LLP	Jun 2013	Text search only	7	2.55	0.00	1.41
Jones Day	Jun 2013	Text search only	686	1.25	0.54	1.12

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	95% wipeout
Matthew S. PoulterLinklaters LLP	Aug 2022	Named in a filing	8	0.00	1.14
John W. CampbellMorrison & Foerster	Jul 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	21	1.35	2.53
Alfredo B. D. SilvaMorrison & Foerster	Nov 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	10	2.31	1.82
Andrew D. ThorpeOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP	Nov 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	29	0.91	0.97
Kevin P. KennedySimpson Thacher & Bartlett	Nov 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	24	1.06	1.18
Charles S. FarmanMorrison & Foerster	Sep 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	5	1.75	1.11