CIRCLE STAR ENERGY CORP. CRCL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1439971Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C.First linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- SRK Law OfficesFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 2.17× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 0.52 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| SRK Law Offices | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.87 | 2.17 | 0.92 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- FAY M. MATSUKAGEDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C.First linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 2.08× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- James GuttmanDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 2.74× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Kenneth G. SamDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Steve KronengoldSRK Law OfficesFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 3.22× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAY M. MATSUKAGEDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.36 | 2.08 | 0.66 |
| James GuttmanDorsey & Whitney LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.66 | 2.74 | 1.07 |
| Kenneth G. SamDorsey & Whitney LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 1.27 |
| Steve KronengoldSRK Law Offices | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 13 | 0.84 | 3.22 | 0.64 |