Grifols SA GIFLF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1438569Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton & Williams | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Proskauer Rose | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.05 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Reed Smith | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.12 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Frank J. LopezProskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Peter G. SamuelsProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Stuart D. FreedmanSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.30 |
| Frank J. LopezProskauer Rose | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 17 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Peter G. SamuelsProskauer Rose | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 10 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Stuart D. FreedmanSchulte Roth & Zabel | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 24 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.34 |