EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. MRAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1438423Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Snell & Wilmer | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Allison PangCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel M. MahoneySnell & WilmerFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 2.04× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Joshua SchneidermanSnell & WilmerFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Brett D. WhiteCooley LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Matthew B. HemingtonCooley LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allison PangCooley LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel M. MahoneySnell & Wilmer | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.25 | 2.04 | 1.65 |
| Joshua SchneidermanSnell & Wilmer | Nov 2020 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Brett D. WhiteCooley LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.27 | 0.84 | 0.97 |
| Matthew B. HemingtonCooley LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.88 | 1.09 | 0.96 |