Green Asia Resources Inc
CIK 1438038Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- AllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Jun 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.59 | 1.50 | 1.49 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| AllBright Law Offices | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 106 | 0.72 | 1.49 | 1.17 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.80 |
| Maples and Calder | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Nixon Peabody | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew D. HuddersGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Floyd I. WittlinBingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- George Town Grand CaymanMaples and CalderFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew D. HuddersGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Jun 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.70 | 1.65 | 1.38 |
| Floyd I. WittlinBingham McCutchen | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 31 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 1.18 |
| George Town Grand CaymanMaples and Calder | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 99 | 1.04 | 0.37 | 1.02 |