DJSP Enterprises, Inc. DJSP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1436612Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC trading suspensionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dykema GossettFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dykema Gossett | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 115 | 0.95 | 0.23 | 0.87 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Maples and Calder | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Sidley Austin | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas S. VaughnDykema GossettFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 181 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas S. VaughnDykema Gossett | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 181 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 1.21 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.09 | 1.37 | 1.07 |