CURAXIS PHARMACEUTICAL Corp CURX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1434893Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Gersten Savage LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucosky Brookman LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 223 | 1.24 | 2.05 | 1.19 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Gersten Savage LLP | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 137 | 1.20 | 1.38 | 1.22 |
| Covington & Burling | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 188 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Jaclyn AmselGersten Savage LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 3.45×
- Paula PescaruGersten Savage LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 188 | 1.24 | 1.81 | 1.24 |
| David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLP | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 85 | 0.88 | 1.89 | 1.25 |
| Jaclyn AmselGersten Savage LLP | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 1.14 | 3.45 |
| Paula PescaruGersten Savage LLP | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 1.28 |