Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. ESPR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1434868Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2015 to Oct 2023
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2026 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Wiggin and DanaFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Jul 2026 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Cooley LLP | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Wiggin and Dana | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 56 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 1.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Adam V. JohnsonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
- Nicole DaleyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- James XuGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2018 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2021 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam V. JohnsonGoodwin Procter | Aug 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.21 |
| Nicole DaleyGoodwin Procter | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| James XuGoodwin Procter | Dec 2018 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin Procter | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 109 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | Aug 2021 | Text search only | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.06 |