7 Days Group Holdings LTD
CIK 1434220Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.02 |
| Maples and Calder | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2013 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.23 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kurt BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Martin P. DunnO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Robert PlesnarskiO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Kurt J. BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Daniel DusekKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Karen M. YanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurt BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.96 | 0.99 | 1.45 |
| Martin P. DunnO Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Robert PlesnarskiO Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.88 | 0.82 | 0.89 |
| Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Kurt J. BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 2.07 |
| Daniel DusekKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Karen M. YanLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 51 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.17 |