SINOCOM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
CIK 1434017Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Frascona, Joiner, Goodman and Greenstein, P.C.First linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 258 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Rothschild LLP | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.91 | 1.38 | 0.86 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Frascona, Joiner, Goodman and Greenstein, P.C. | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.38 | 1.47 | 0.74 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | May 2011 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | May 2011 | Text search only | 258 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Calvin C. LaiSullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Gary S. JoinerFrascona, Joiner, Goodman and Greenstein, P.C.First linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calvin C. LaiSullivan & Cromwell | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Gary S. JoinerFrascona, Joiner, Goodman and Greenstein, P.C. | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.50 | 1.55 | 0.68 |