ANTERO RESOURCES Corp AR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1433270Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- May 2014 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Baker BottsFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| Baker Botts | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 0.98 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott D. RubinskyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Matt StrockVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jan 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.75×
- Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 135 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Matthew StrockVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.45×
- W. Matthew StrockVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.16×
- David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott D. RubinskyVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Matt StrockVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jan 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 2.75 |
| Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 72 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 135 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Matthew StrockVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 2.45 |
| W. Matthew StrockVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 2.16 |
| David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 78 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 1.30 |