Diligent Corp DIL.NZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1433269Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- LATHROP & GAGE LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2008 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willkie Farr | Apr 2016 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| LATHROP & GAGE LLP | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.32 | 0.88 | 0.52 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2008 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan D. ElwynWillkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Wallace E. BrockhoffLATHROP & GAGE LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan D. ElwynWillkie Farr | Apr 2016 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Wallace E. BrockhoffLATHROP & GAGE LLP | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |