FIRST CHINA PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP, INC. FCPG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1432254Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- SRK Law OfficesFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 2.17× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| SRK Law Offices | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.87 | 2.17 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Derek J. MirzaGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 4.95× · 95% wipeout 2.59×
- Mark C. LeeGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 3.20× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derek J. MirzaGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.16 | 4.95 | 2.59 |
| Mark C. LeeGreenberg Traurig | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.70 | 3.20 | 1.75 |