ECHO TECHNOLOGY (DELAWARE) INC.
CIK 1432242Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Orrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 2008 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 2,669 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 517 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 2008 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 2,669 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 517 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lowell D. NessOrrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.98×
- Peter CohnOrrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Mark J. GentileRichards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 2008 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Joshua M. DubofskyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowell D. NessOrrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 1.98 |
| Peter CohnOrrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| Mark J. GentileRichards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 2008 | Text search only | 5 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 54 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Joshua M. DubofskyLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 24 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.68 |