THAR PHARMACEUTICALS INC
CIK 1428369Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Meyer Unkovic & ScottFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Meyer Unkovic & Scott | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 7 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel LangGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Stephen M. DavisGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel LangGoodwin Procter | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Stephen M. DavisGoodwin Procter | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.61 | 1.35 | 1.39 |