Redstar Partners, Inc.
CIK 1425984Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.23 |
| Graubard Miller | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Kathleen L. CervenyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 3.30× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.72 | 1.81 | 1.02 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.33 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 195 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 1.20 |
| Kathleen L. CervenyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.51 | 3.30 | 2.28 |