ORTHOPEDIATRICS CORP KIDS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1425450Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dentons Bingham Greenebaum LLPFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bingham Greenebaum DollFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Ulmer & BerneFirst linked Oct 2017 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dentons Bingham Greenebaum LLP | Mar 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Bingham Greenebaum Doll | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Cooley LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Ulmer & Berne | Oct 2017 | Text search only | 34 | 1.22 | 0.49 | 1.18 |
| Reed Smith | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark B. WeeksCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Brent B. SilerCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Christopher D. LuekingLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark B. WeeksCooley LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.56 |
| Brent B. SilerCooley LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.40 | 0.57 | 1.70 |
| Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 74 | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.69 |
| Christopher D. LuekingLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.61 |