Blue Earth, Inc. BBLU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1422109Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Sep 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2009 to Jul 2016
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
- DAVIDOFF MALITO & HUTCHER LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.83× · Went dark 4.16× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Locke LordFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Ater Wynne LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Durham Jones & PinegarFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 2.04 | 0.86 | 2.12 |
| DAVIDOFF MALITO & HUTCHER LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.83 | 4.16 | 1.36 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Locke Lord | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Ater Wynne LLP | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 23 | 1.36 | 0.74 | 0.97 |
| Durham Jones & Pinegar | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 47 | 1.70 | 1.06 | 1.40 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elliot H. LutzkerDavidoff Hutcher & Citron LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 1.87× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Benjamin S. ReichelEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Harvey J. KesnerSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Carl M. ShererRimon P.C.First linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Kevin R. PinegarDurham Jones & PinegarFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 2.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elliot H. LutzkerDavidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.67 | 1.87 | 1.23 |
| Benjamin S. ReichelEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 1.34 | 0.37 | 1.69 |
| Harvey J. KesnerSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.02 | 0.90 | 1.50 |
| Carl M. ShererRimon P.C. | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.09 |
| Kevin R. PinegarDurham Jones & Pinegar | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 15 | 2.36 | 1.17 | 2.62 |