iBio, Inc. IBIO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1420720Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2020 to Aug 2025
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Feb 2026 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Jul 2024 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Zysman Aharoni GayerFirst linked Oct 2019 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Choate Hall & StewartFirst linked May 2008 · Text search only · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- ST. JOHN & WAYNE, L.L.C.First linked May 2008 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.65× · 95% wipeout 2.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Venable LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Covington & Burling | Feb 2026 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Jul 2024 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2020 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Zysman Aharoni Gayer | Oct 2019 | Text search only | 42 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Choate Hall & Stewart | May 2008 | Text search only | 142 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 1.29 |
| ST. JOHN & WAYNE, L.L.C. | May 2008 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 3.65 | 2.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Andrew H. AbramowitzGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.23×
- Brian K. RosenzweigCovington & BurlingFirst linked Feb 2026 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Jul 2024 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank Rome | Sep 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in a filing | 77 | 0.66 | 2.28 | 1.53 |
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.43 |
| Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.89 |
| Andrew H. AbramowitzGreenberg Traurig | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.23 |
| Brian K. RosenzweigCovington & Burling | Feb 2026 | Text search only | 36 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein Sandler | Jul 2024 | Text search only | 69 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.36 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Nov 2020 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |