BPW Acquisition Corp. BPW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1418255Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 126 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Akin Gump | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew M. GuestWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Ann F. ChamberlainBingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.87× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin GumpFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Mark ZvonkovicAkin GumpFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Daniel G. BerickSquire Sanders (US)First linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew M. GuestWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 67 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Ann F. ChamberlainBingham McCutchen | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 2.07 |
| Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin Gump | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Mark ZvonkovicAkin Gump | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Daniel G. BerickSquire Sanders (US) | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.50 |