WSP Holdings LTD
CIK 1418225Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Salley Bowes HarwardtFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.85× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Ziegler Ziegler & AssociatesFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gunderson Dettmer | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Dechert LLP | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Salley Bowes Harwardt | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 2.85 | 1.02 |
| Ziegler Ziegler & Associates | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 37 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.97 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.02 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Piper Rudnick | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jesse SheleyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Benjamin SuKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Benjamin W. JamesKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Fan ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- John A. OtoshiLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jesse SheleyKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
| Benjamin W. JamesKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 47 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Fan ZhangKirkland & Ellis | May 2013 | Text search only | 8 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| John A. OtoshiLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 24 | 1.77 | 1.16 | 1.42 |