INVO Fertility, Inc. IVF (last ticker on record)

CIK 1417926Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restructuring
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
95% wipeout
Restatement

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began Jun 2026
Largest fall in its shares: 99%; Nov 2008 to Apr 2025
Law firms: 9; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 8; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Jun 2, 2026Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 29, 2026Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 19, 2026Shares down 95% from their high
Apr 18, 2025Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 31, 2025Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 16, 2025Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 16, 2025Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 20, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 20, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 19, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 8, 2023Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 13, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 30, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 28, 2023Shares down 95% from their high
Mar 28, 2023Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 23, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Jan 12, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 28, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 28, 2009Shares down 95% from their high

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs, Howard & Shapiro, LLP	Jul 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	8	1.06	0.00	0.91
Sheppard Mullin	Mar 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	392	1.12	0.81	1.22
Dentons US LLP	Oct 2019	Named in SEC correspondence	102	0.91	0.40	1.48
Shulman Rogers, P.A.	Feb 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	25	2.71	1.26	1.16
Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Jan 2025	Text search only	963	0.96	1.12	1.21
Loeb & Loeb LLP	Jul 2023	Text search only	838	0.92	0.99	1.10
Covington & Burling	Sep 2020	Text search only	447	1.07	0.27	0.99
McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter	Dec 2018	Text search only	10	0.75	0.00	1.07
Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP	Dec 2018	Text search only	1,005	1.27	1.62	1.26

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Jan 2025	Named in a filing	187	0.98	1.25	1.32
Matthew BernsteinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Jan 2025	Named in a filing	20	0.00	0.00	1.13
Marc A. IndegliaIndeglia & Carney, P.C.	Jan 2024	Named in SEC correspondence	19	0.46	1.81	1.10
Ira L. KotelDentons US LLP	Sep 2020	Named in a filing	13	0.00	0.00	1.60
Greg CarneySheppard Mullin	Jul 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	33	1.41	0.46	1.19
Debbie A. KlisRimon P.C.	Feb 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	23	1.76	0.00	1.10
Scott D. MuselesShulman Rogers, P.A.	Feb 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	11	2.45	0.00	1.72
Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP	Jul 2023	Text search only	391	0.98	0.93	1.21