FINCERA INC. SCRQF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1417370Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2017 · Named in a filing · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 841 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | May 2017 | Named in a filing | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.80 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 841 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.13 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | May 2009 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Graubard Miller | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.49 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven D. PidgeonDLA PiperFirst linked May 2017 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 181 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven D. PidgeonDLA Piper | May 2017 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.01 |
| Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 181 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 1.22 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 1.22 |