WHITING USA TRUST I WHX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1417003Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C.First linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracewell LLP | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.96 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| Holland & Hart | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.95 |
| Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C. | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 17 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas W. AdkinsBracewell LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Benjamin F. Garmer IIIFoley & LardnerFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- David H. StoneVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas W. AdkinsBracewell LLP | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Benjamin F. Garmer IIIFoley & Lardner | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| David H. StoneVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 1.90 |
| David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 78 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.30 |