China Cablecom Holdings, Ltd. CABL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1416569Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 841 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 841 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.13 |
| Maples and Calder | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Blank Rome | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
| Graubard Miller | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- George Town Grand CaymanMaples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2008 · Text search only · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Mark L. BaumThe Baum Law FirmFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.76× · Went dark 2.06× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.22 |
| George Town Grand CaymanMaples and Calder | Apr 2008 | Text search only | 99 | 1.04 | 0.37 | 1.02 |
| Mark L. BaumThe Baum Law Firm | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 20 | 2.76 | 2.06 | 0.74 |