TAM AIRLINES S.A.
CIK 1415933Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2007 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Ziegler Ziegler & AssociatesFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.93 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2007 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Willkie Farr | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
| Ziegler Ziegler & Associates | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 37 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Francesca LavinCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.15×
- Sara HanksClifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francesca LavinCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 2.15 |
| Sara HanksClifford Chance US LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.32 |