China Redstone Group, Inc.
CIK 1415592Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Tian Yuan Law FirmFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 2.01× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.35 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 1.07 |
| Tian Yuan Law Firm | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 75 | 1.99 | 2.01 | 1.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jamie H. KimRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Francis ChenRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.50× · 95% wipeout 2.38×
- Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Nimish PatelRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamie H. KimRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.78 |
| Francis ChenRichardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 2.38 |
| Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 34 | 0.52 | 0.98 | 1.60 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 1.24 | 1.39 | 1.06 |
| Nimish PatelRichardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 39 | 1.15 | 1.05 | 1.42 |