Philip Morris International Inc. PM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1413329Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Jones DayFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Shook Hardy & BaconFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2007 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Hunton & Williams | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Arnold & Porter | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Jones Day | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Shook Hardy & Bacon | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 35 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.76 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2007 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anna K. SpenceDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna K. SpenceDLA Piper | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.14 | — | 1.18 |
| Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA Piper | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.92 |