ChinaEdu CORP CEDU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1411419Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- HART & HARTFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.23 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| HART & HART | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 50 | 1.47 | 2.20 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lawrence S. VenickLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- James E. ShowenHogan & HartsonFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul W. Boltz Jr.Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence S. VenickLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 164 | 0.85 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| James E. ShowenHogan & Hartson | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul W. Boltz Jr.Ropes & Gray | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 17 | 1.07 | 1.29 | 0.86 |