Green Power Enterprises, Inc.
CIK 1408358Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Maples and Calder | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Proskauer Rose | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.05 |
| Graubard Miller | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
| Thompson & Knight | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.30 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William N. HaddadVenable LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William N. HaddadVenable LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 40 | 1.71 | 0.41 | 1.39 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.28 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 195 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 1.19 |
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.30 |