Syngence Corp
CIK 1406953Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Tonkon TorpFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoel Rives | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Tonkon Torp | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 24 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. HalleStoel RivesFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.45×
- Thomas P. PalmerTonkon TorpFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. HalleStoel Rives | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 11 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 2.45 |
| Thomas P. PalmerTonkon Torp | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.37 |