CALIX, INC CALX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1406666Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Nov 2009 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.14 |
| Faegre & Benson | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Heller Ehrman | Nov 2009 | Text search only | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Michael J. TorosianDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2010 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 1.20 | 1.25 | 0.98 |
| Michael J. TorosianDLA Piper | Mar 2010 | Text search only | 6 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.00 |