SINOHUB, INC. SIHI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1406574Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Oct 2009 to Nov 2012
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- The Crone Law GroupFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 116 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 2.14× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Waller Lansden Dortch & DavisFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seyfarth Shaw | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
| The Crone Law Group | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 116 | 1.23 | 2.14 | 1.31 |
| Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 76 | 1.06 | 0.65 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory L. WhiteSeyfarth ShawFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.78× · 95% wipeout 3.01×
- Mark A. KatzoffSeyfarth ShawFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.95× · Went dark 3.10× · 95% wipeout 4.41×
- Adam M. GuttmannThe Crone Law GroupFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.39× · Went dark 3.29× · 95% wipeout 4.13×
- Randall S. GouldingFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.12× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory L. WhiteSeyfarth Shaw | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 3.01 |
| Mark A. KatzoffSeyfarth Shaw | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.95 | 3.10 | 4.41 |
| Adam M. GuttmannThe Crone Law Group | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.39 | 3.29 | 4.13 |
| Randall S. Goulding | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 21 | 3.12 | 1.41 | 2.33 |