HUBSPOT INC HUBS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1404655Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Arthur Cox | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Brown Rudnick | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Cooley LLP | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| HALE AND DORR | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Mark T. BettencourtGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- David D. GammellGunderson DettmerFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- H. David HenkenGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin Procter | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Mark T. BettencourtGoodwin Procter | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| David D. GammellGunderson Dettmer | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| H. David HenkenGoodwin Procter | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 15 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 2.29 |