Perfect World Co., Ltd.
CIK 1403849Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Orrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 2,669 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- King & WoodFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 2,669 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Maples and Calder | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
| King & Wood | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.23 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| White & Case | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dan OuyangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 2.58× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Daniel DusekKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2015 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Richard V. SmithOrrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jie Jeffrey SunOrrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Jeffrey J. SunOrrick Herrington & SutcliffeFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- George Town Grand CaymanMaples and CalderFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan OuyangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.30 | 2.58 | 1.78 |
| Daniel DusekKirkland & Ellis | May 2015 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Richard V. SmithOrrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jie Jeffrey SunOrrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Jeffrey J. SunOrrick Herrington & Sutcliffe | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 7 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| George Town Grand CaymanMaples and Calder | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 99 | 1.04 | 0.37 | 1.03 |