ZST Digital Networks, Inc. ZSTN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1403794Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Han KunFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Han Kun | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
| K&L Gates | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anh Q. TranK&L GatesFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- V. Joseph StubbsStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Scott GalerStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Thomas J. PolettiK&L GatesFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- David N. FeldmanFeldman WeinsteinFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Randall S. GouldingFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.12× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anh Q. TranK&L Gates | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.54 | 1.32 | 1.78 |
| V. Joseph StubbsStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.75 | 1.08 | 0.73 |
| Scott GalerStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Thomas J. PolettiK&L Gates | Jan 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 1.51 | 1.24 | 1.75 |
| David N. FeldmanFeldman Weinstein | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 145 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 1.16 |
| Randall S. Goulding | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 21 | 3.12 | 1.41 | 2.33 |