JRjr33, Inc. JRJR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1403085Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Reed SmithFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Gardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- David Lubin & Associates, PLLCFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.52× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- LeClairRyan A Professional CorporationFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Calfee Halter & GriswoldFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed Smith | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
| Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 117 | 1.13 | 0.97 | 1.24 |
| David Lubin & Associates, PLLC | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 100 | 1.05 | 1.52 | 1.09 |
| LeClairRyan A Professional Corporation | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 93 | 0.77 | 0.42 | 1.10 |
| Calfee Halter & Griswold | May 2014 | Text search only | 70 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wendy GrassoReed SmithFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
- Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- David LubinDavid Lubin & Associates, PLLCFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy GrassoReed Smith | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 0.66 | 2.28 | 1.53 |
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.43 |
| David LubinDavid Lubin & Associates, PLLC | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 110 | 0.96 | 1.61 | 1.09 |