Cosan Ltd. CSAN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1402902Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| White & Case | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Diane G. KerrDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.55×
- Glenn M. ReiterSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- Manuel GarciadiazDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Donald BakerWhite & CaseFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diane G. KerrDavis Polk | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 3.55 |
| Glenn M. ReiterSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 2.04 |
| Manuel GarciadiazDavis Polk | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Donald BakerWhite & Case | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 15 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |